A federal judge on Friday threw out US President Donald Trump’s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times , ruling that the complaint was not "legally sufficient."
US district judge Steven Merryday of Florida said the filing "failed to provide a proper basis" for the court to consider.
“As every lawyer knows, or is presumed to know, a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective − not a protected platform to rage against an adversary. A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally,” Merryday wrote, according to USA Today.
The judge gave Trump 28 days to refile. Trump had accused the Times of publishing “malicious accusations” against him through a series of articles and an editorial declaring him “unfit” for office ahead of the 2024 election. The suit also cited "Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success" - a 2024 book by Penguin written by Times reporters Susanne Craig and Ross Buettner.
Also Read | 'Combination of intimidation and pure lunacy': Martina Navratilova accuses Donald Trump of silencing media with $15 billion lawsuit
Reporters Craig, Buettner, Peter Baker, and Michael Schmidt were named as defendants alongside the newspaper and publisher.
An earlier statement by the Times dismissed the case as "baseless": “It lacks any legitimate legal claims and instead is an attempt to stifle and discourage independent reporting. The New York Times will not be deterred by intimidation tactics. We will continue to pursue the facts without fear or favour and stand up for journalists’ First Amendment right to ask questions on behalf of the American people.”
The lawsuit was filed on September 15.
US district judge Steven Merryday of Florida said the filing "failed to provide a proper basis" for the court to consider.
“As every lawyer knows, or is presumed to know, a complaint is not a public forum for vituperation and invective − not a protected platform to rage against an adversary. A complaint is not a megaphone for public relations or a podium for a passionate oration at a political rally,” Merryday wrote, according to USA Today.
The judge gave Trump 28 days to refile. Trump had accused the Times of publishing “malicious accusations” against him through a series of articles and an editorial declaring him “unfit” for office ahead of the 2024 election. The suit also cited "Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success" - a 2024 book by Penguin written by Times reporters Susanne Craig and Ross Buettner.
Also Read | 'Combination of intimidation and pure lunacy': Martina Navratilova accuses Donald Trump of silencing media with $15 billion lawsuit
Reporters Craig, Buettner, Peter Baker, and Michael Schmidt were named as defendants alongside the newspaper and publisher.
An earlier statement by the Times dismissed the case as "baseless": “It lacks any legitimate legal claims and instead is an attempt to stifle and discourage independent reporting. The New York Times will not be deterred by intimidation tactics. We will continue to pursue the facts without fear or favour and stand up for journalists’ First Amendment right to ask questions on behalf of the American people.”
The lawsuit was filed on September 15.
You may also like
Ruben Amorim set for Man Utd sack if he fails to do what Sir Jim Ratcliffe's demanded
'Why assume Americans won't pick a Black woman president, gay VP? Pete Buttigieg on Kamala Harris' memoir revelation; counters 'he knew it too' claim
SRA's RTI Data Mysteriously Surfaces After First Appeal Although Housing Department Earlier Denied Receiving Any Such Data
Gladiator's Nitro says he's 'bulletproof' for Strictly Come Dancing after serious injury
Louis Tomlinson duped by criminal gang in £6m Doncaster Rovers fraud plot
